Hurrell Moseley Dawson and Grimmer is born...
LONDON - Hurrell and Dawson is sticking to a 'name-over-the-door' moniker, with news that it's to rebrand as Hurrell Moseley Dawson and Grimmer.
The change reflects the agency's appointment of two new partners over the past six months. Shunning the route taken in January by start up shop Adam & Eve, HMDG's four equity partners will instead be represented. Scroll down and tell us what you think below.
ADVERTISEMENT
It is understood that the quartet deliberated for some weeks over other more creative options, but concluded their names would lend them the strongest brand identity.
Hurrell and Dawson was founded in 2006. Al Moseley (below) and Greg Grimmer (bottom) both joined the shop this year.


Dawson and Hurrell
More like this
- Close-Up: Newsmaker - Moseley looks for an 'art school culture' at H&D
- H&D poaches Al Moseley
- Grimmer embarks on marriage of love
- Entries sought for 2008 online awards
- Bernard Matthews appoints Isobel to ad account
- Grey London wins Look magazine account
- Star writers in new campaign for Reveal magazine
- Agencies come full circle
- Diary: Water-cooler monitor
- Greg Grimmer joins Hurrell and Dawson
Tags
Jobs
- Account Director :: EXPERIENTIAL :: COOL BRANDS
- £40K-£45K + benefits
- Senior Account Manager or Account Director
- £30k - £45k + bens + bonus
- Director of Marketing
- £47,250 - £53,500
- Account Manager


Comments
Julian Hough - 13/02/2008
Brilliant naming strategy! Clever, original, distinctive. One worry - did they do a name check? I am sure there is a funeral director in North London with a similar moniker.
Duncan James - 13/02/2008
Ha. It is not the 1980s. I also do agree that "A&E", Naked, Rise etc are pretty tired now too. And the pun name feels a bit E2 (stckleback etc). Not an easy job having named our own agency, but let your product do the talking. Does say 'wannabe big ad agency though'.
- 13/02/2008
I always wanted to call my media buying breakaway Bastard Media.
Gellan Watt - 13/02/2008
I like it. It wouldn't have worked for my agency. Watt Results. or Watt Advertising just wouldn't have worked!!! :)
Gellan Watt - 13/02/2008
Or Watt Creative.... argh.. even worse.
Gellan Watt - 13/02/2008
And my business partner is now my wife.... image Watt & Watt - it doesn't have much oomph does it. :)
GRAHAM WEST - 13/02/2008
Watt the...!?
N CHRISTIE - 13/02/2008
I always wonder in these circumstances how the order of names is agreed. HMDG isn't alphabetical. And it wasn't done in chronological order, or Hurrell and Dawson would have stayed first. So, what kind of negotiation led to Al pushing his way through the queue to second place? Particularly when the agency is already known, to Campaign readers at least, as Hurrell and Dawson. Maybe they just drew names out of a hat. Anyway, first two names is where you need to be if your name is important to you, because from now on everyone will have to get used to referring to it as Hurrell Moseley.
Jeremy Lee - 14/02/2008
I doubt advertisers care what it's called, rather its proposition and the quality of its work. Best of luck to them.
Mark Smith - 15/02/2008
My suspicion is that the order of names was determined by how much money each put in
Francesca Fisher - 15/02/2008
If they'd put the creative's name third or fourth, it would have looked like they don't value creative.
Mark Smith - 15/02/2008
I think Francesca is right. Does that mean media is an after thought/bolt -on as Grimmer is last?
Gellan Watt - 18/02/2008
I think we may be looking at it in a bit too much detail.