/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
The study, carried out by Engage Research and Global Market Insite, claims that high drop-out rates compromise the quality of both sample and data.
It states that online questionnaires need to address key factors such as visual presentation, repetitive question formats and length in order to effectively engage respondents and maintain the "integrity and actionability" of research data.
Engage Reserach and GMI examined the drop-out rates from over 550 surveys and correlated these with survey length and question formats.
The study also asked a sample of 200 online panellists what bored and frustrated them in online questionnaires.
It then compared static HTML questionnaires with those using Flash animation and traditional question formats with more innovative ones, in order to identify alternative question presentations that would engage better with respondents.
The research revealed that if boredom sets in, respondents increase the speed at which they answer questions, leading to fewer responses being given generally, and a loss of data quality due to a combination of increased pattern answering and a shift away from using scale extremities.
Respondents said that relevance of subject matter and an interest in the questions were influential in deciding whether they would complete a survey or not.
Key research findings included that a lot of people drop out within the first five minutes of an online interview, but once passed this threshold they are more likely to complete the survey, regardless of length.
The study also showed that certain question formats are more likely to trigger drop-out than others, such as grids, which generate 80% more drop-out than other question formats.
Engage and GMI recommend more visually appealing and engaging mechanisms such as scrolling matrices or drag and drop, along with the use of Flash animation.
Deborah Sleep, director at Engage Research, said: "The research industry has focused too much on trying to replicate question formats from other data collection methods into an online environment, and not enough on the new and different features that online data collection has to offer.
"Researchers, clients and panel providers need to be more respondent-friendly and create more engaging ways of collecting data in the not too distant future."
Comments
Here at Research Now we have been using Flash technologies within our survey design for at least the past two years, we have observed that the added respondent engagement does deliver a happier panelist experience !
it becomes a catch 22 situation. Clients might buy online to reach people more cheaply than F2F or telephone, but in doing so see research as a commodity, and so are willing to spend less on delivery.
Grids \(matrix questions) are seductive to the questionnaire author, since grids pack a lot of information into a single page. Too often, though, the rows of the grid make distinctions that are far too fine for the average respondent. And then the grid might be repeated three times, each trying to capture a different nuance. Survey authors need to remember that real people are completing these, and design accordingly.
I have to agree... completely! While working with GMI as a usability analyst I uncovered numerous examples of extremely poor survey UI design. I would categorize most of the examples as data acquisition at any cost. Although my primary focus was on improving the usability of GMI's MR software, it was frustrating to see so many brutal survey UI designs. Another example of don't fix what's perceived as "not broken". By focussing on the needs of the end-user \(AKA the survey respondent) and ensuring that an appropriate blend of form and function are delivered, attrition is no longer an issue. This is why Vision Critical is excelling while others are not.
This is interesting research \(I think I saw some results from this at the ESOMAR Panel conference in Dublin last month).
I have a suspicion that one of the reasons that some question types are so popular is that they make it easier for the analysis stage - my colleague was sent an online survey yesterday where you could practically see the graphs that they wanted to draw from the questionnaire.
I've worked with some very complicated questionnaires in the past and have found that simplifying and innovating the format of questions not only improves the user experience but often ends up with a better written set of questions and more informative set of results for the client.
I've been filling out student satisfaction /graduate surveys for years, and I have to say the bare mechanics of the thing is paramount. If you've been filling in a survey for 15+ minutes and clicking "back" takes you to the start page, you'll never want to bother again.
Over the past 4 years, we've found that the tools we've developed at Qubiq not only improve respondent experience and data quality, but have also opened opportunities to capture more complex and insightful data than static surveys with respondents feeling like they're do less work, not more! – good news for everyone. Putting respondents at the heart of the experience can have benefits for everyone involved and shouldn't be seen as a luxury!
Once bitten twice shy i am afraid - Uphill battle to change the minds of millions of online survey haters !
A simple, short, survey with, rewarding animation can go along way. Not everything about the customer has to be extracted in the initial survey, the relationship can develop over time. Cowan Group created the following for Hush Puppies: http://www.hushpuppies-shoesfit.co.uk/
I think the issue goes beyond simply making surveys less boring - but to some of the fundamental principles underpinning conventional research - ie what is the role of the respondent in helping us understand what is going on. The old paradigm of 'respondent as laboratory rat' has some serious failings and it is time we explored new ways of gathering information and understanding what is really happening out there
You surveyed people to see if they were bored with surveys? Who the hell filled it in?
Comments
John Caldwell - 17/11/2008
Here at Research Now we have been using Flash technologies within our survey design for at least the past two years, we have observed that the added respondent engagement does deliver a happier panelist experience !
JAMES SMYTHE - 17/11/2008
it becomes a catch 22 situation. Clients might buy online to reach people more cheaply than F2F or telephone, but in doing so see research as a commodity, and so are willing to spend less on delivery.
Jeffrey Henning - 17/11/2008
Grids \(matrix questions) are seductive to the questionnaire author, since grids pack a lot of information into a single page. Too often, though, the rows of the grid make distinctions that are far too fine for the average respondent. And then the grid might be repeated three times, each trying to capture a different nuance. Survey authors need to remember that real people are completing these, and design accordingly.
Shawn Mabey - 17/11/2008
I have to agree... completely! While working with GMI as a usability analyst I uncovered numerous examples of extremely poor survey UI design. I would categorize most of the examples as data acquisition at any cost. Although my primary focus was on improving the usability of GMI's MR software, it was frustrating to see so many brutal survey UI designs. Another example of don't fix what's perceived as "not broken". By focussing on the needs of the end-user \(AKA the survey respondent) and ensuring that an appropriate blend of form and function are delivered, attrition is no longer an issue. This is why Vision Critical is excelling while others are not.
Matthew Rhodes - 18/11/2008
This is interesting research \(I think I saw some results from this at the ESOMAR Panel conference in Dublin last month). I have a suspicion that one of the reasons that some question types are so popular is that they make it easier for the analysis stage - my colleague was sent an online survey yesterday where you could practically see the graphs that they wanted to draw from the questionnaire. I've worked with some very complicated questionnaires in the past and have found that simplifying and innovating the format of questions not only improves the user experience but often ends up with a better written set of questions and more informative set of results for the client.
Dave Stoker - 18/11/2008
I've been filling out student satisfaction /graduate surveys for years, and I have to say the bare mechanics of the thing is paramount. If you've been filling in a survey for 15+ minutes and clicking "back" takes you to the start page, you'll never want to bother again.
Susan Morse - 19/11/2008
Over the past 4 years, we've found that the tools we've developed at Qubiq not only improve respondent experience and data quality, but have also opened opportunities to capture more complex and insightful data than static surveys with respondents feeling like they're do less work, not more! – good news for everyone. Putting respondents at the heart of the experience can have benefits for everyone involved and shouldn't be seen as a luxury!
AwallafaShagba - 19/11/2008
Once bitten twice shy i am afraid - Uphill battle to change the minds of millions of online survey haters !
Anthony Monger - 24/11/2008
A simple, short, survey with, rewarding animation can go along way. Not everything about the customer has to be extracted in the initial survey, the relationship can develop over time. Cowan Group created the following for Hush Puppies: http://www.hushpuppies-shoesfit.co.uk/
David Alterman - 27/11/2008
I think the issue goes beyond simply making surveys less boring - but to some of the fundamental principles underpinning conventional research - ie what is the role of the respondent in helping us understand what is going on. The old paradigm of 'respondent as laboratory rat' has some serious failings and it is time we explored new ways of gathering information and understanding what is really happening out there
Tom Baker - 08/12/2008
You surveyed people to see if they were bored with surveys? Who the hell filled it in?
Dukie - 22/12/2008
Dooh