Should brands Spotify?
LONDON - Spotify, the new online music streaming service, is being hailed as a means of targeting individual music lovers with audio ads.
Already the service has signed up brands including Xbox, T-Mobile, Vodafone, Philips, HMV, Sainsbury's, Nissan and Sony to trial ads in its beta phase.
There are two versions of the service: the free, ad-supported version, which requires you to listen to around one minute of advertising every 30 minutes, and the paid-for version, which removes the advertising in return for a subscription of £9.99 per month.
ADVERTISEMENT
Creative agency Engine claims Spotify is a chance to get back into ‘mixtapes' with friends and colleagues.
Gareth Phillips, MD of Syzygy, says: ‘Spotify is a potential replacement for iTunes: I can use for listening to the music that I want to listen to when I want to listen to it. The technology is less hassle to install than iTunes, with a user interface that's been easily picked up by all the family instantaneously.'
But, more than that, the service offers advertisers the possibility of reaching fans in a certain location or age group or with similar music tastes as the site requires registration details including postcode, gender and date of birth.
Daniel de Sybel, head of technology at interactive agency Media Contacts, is tipping the service as ‘the start of the future of audio advertising'. He says: ‘It is like radio advertising but more targeted and trackable. It offers the possibility of direct response ads for brands.'
Spotify founder Daniel Ek claims the service will be profitable by the end of the year. But some argue that ad revenues for the site and the number of users prepared to subscribe will be too small.
George Nimeh, managing director of Iris Digital, says the subscription rates are not high, meaning that more people could opt for the ad-free model. But, he adds, this would be dependent on Spotify's ability to increase its selection of tracks.
He warns that it has ‘narrow appeal for brands' except for music and entertainment brands.
He points out that the deal to allow users to listen to U2's new album on Spotify was ‘a no-brainer' to create buzz in advance of the album's official release.
Nimeh says the service is creating so much buzz because ‘the world is waiting for a credible iTunes killer'. He adds that Apple's iTunes has credibility with consumers but that it is ‘clunky' and difficult to navigate.
The service is also being welcomed by the music industry as a viable competitor to illegal music downloads. By making legal tracks free to access it aims to encourage people not to opt for illegal music file downloading. It has already got record labels including Universal Music Group, Sony BMG, EMI Music, Warner Music Group, Merlin and The Orchard signed up and is adding 10,000 tracks a day.
But according to new research from Tiscali, illegal downloading is not likely to fizzle out anytime soon. In a study conducted on the tiscali.co.uk music channel, nearly half of respondents (46%) know that illegal downloading is damaging to the music industry but they still do it because they say there is no incentive to make them stop.
Whether free, accessible music services like Spotify are incentive enough, is yet to be seen.
Spotify
Tags
Jobs
- Digital Content Manager, Sage UK Limited
- , North East England
- Account Manager, Livewire PR
- £27-33K, West London
- MARKETING MANAGER :: INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY COMPANY, Dylan*
- Up to £55k + fantastic bens, Central London
- STAFFING AGENCY :: INTEGRATED AGENCY, Dylan*
- ,


Comments
Mark Palmer - 24/02/2009
Spotify is an interesting idea in that it starts clearly with the commercial model where as many online services don't. That said...it is dependent on the who uses it and how many. It isn't first or only service in this space where you can target music users. How popular it will be depends on both usage...but also the playlist \(weaker than others at present). We 7 set up by Peter Gabriel is ad funded in this space alrteady. More signifificant is Last.fm, with about 25m users, free access, instant gig locator and on all sorts of mobiles. See the O2 Apple I-phone TV ad. So by all means target by music..interesting idea....but if that appeals have a look around too.
George Nimeh - 24/02/2009
Mark, good points. Though, you can't pick tracks and create playlists on Last.fm ... As they add 10K tracks/day, I think the service will become more relevant. Their premium service \(rumored to include an offline option for mobile) is also very interesting. In terms of having a commercial model, well, having one is probably a good idea for a business. Otherwise, they'd be charities. ;-) Seriously, I think in order to get all those labels signed up, I imagine they needed it to be sorted.
Anil Kapoor - 25/02/2009
Spotify is much better than Last.FM. Good luck guys.
Jamie Riddell - 25/02/2009
At the very least Spotify is an online equivalent of radio. You listen to songs, you have ads in between, with some banners on the interface. The Spotify service is excellent when you want to listen to what you want, not be fed with alternative ideas like Last FM. The concept is not rocket science it just works - no streaming issues and no hassle. The radio advertising on here is also fine and non intrusive. Interestingly I saw an ad on TV the other day and recognised the tune. It turned out to be Direct Gov who had been advertising on here so it works. From a marketing perspective, I would suggest there are too few ads on here, Listening all day I hear about 5 ads? They also need to work on the ad relevancy, playing ads announcing a movie in cinemas last month \(Revolutionary Road) was a little wasted.
AwallafaShagba - 27/02/2009
Spotify is INDEED better than LastFM . BUT - LastFM has those all important "listened to" stats and great mobile apps like Mobbler to back up its cross platform offering. I wonder if the guys at Spotify have these gems up their sleeves??