Why 'Mad Men' makes me mad

by George Parker, Brand Republic 06-Aug-08, 08:00

I have to confess, I have this love-hate relationship with 'Mad Men', which just started its second season over here in the US, writes George Parker.

After its first season the show won critical acclaim and a couple of Golden Globes for best TV drama and best actor, Jon Hamm, the guy playing Don Draper, Sterling Cooper's severely screwed up creative director, who is presented as some kind of reincarnation of Leonardo da Vinci.

As Siskel and Ebert, the big-time movie critics here in the US used to say... "It's a one thumb up, one thumb down" kind of show.

First, it's very well written, in terms of plot structure, even though it smacks of excess melodrama. I do though, have problems with some of the over-the-top dialogue.

In the scene where Don has taken Rachel Menkin, the Jewish owner of the retail store (probably modelled after Bonwit & Teller, which sadly, is no longer in existence) to a bar to apologise on behalf of the agency, he delivers a series of really limp dick lines, culminating in... "Love is a word invented by guys like me to sell nylons."

Oh for Christ's sake, even when I was a snot nose kid of 25 in my first Madison Avenue job, I could think up better lines than that to pull birds.

Obviously they did a major job in recreating the office atmosphere, clothing, hair do's, furnishings and office equipment.

Just one nit pick, the first series takes place in 1960 and the secretaries are all pounding away on IBM Selectrics. They didn't hit the market until 1961.

In the second series, taking place in 1962, they proudly roll in the very latest in office productivity, a Xerox 914 copier. These were introduced in 1959 and any self respecting agency wouldn't have waited three long years to get one and start billing clients for all those 17.65% marked-up copies.

My first job in the States was in 1964 at Benton & Bowles, New York, so I'm one of the few people who've watched this series that can speak from the experience of actually having lived through it.

A lot of idiots have complained about all the very non-PC, smoking, drinking and screwing taking place. That's as dumb as complaining about lions eating Christians in Toga Flicks. However, even though we all smoked like chimneys, we never smoked in elevators as one of the young AE's did. That was a no-no along with not taking your hat off if there was a lady in the elevator.

Yes we all drank like fishes, but we did it at lunch time and after work. No one had drink trays and ice buckets like the Don Draper character. And no one poured their first Scotch with an Alka Seltzer at nine in the morning as the closeted gay AD, Salvatore did.

Even when I worked at Warwick & Legler, which was the main Seagram Booze agency, we'd get ploughed during our three martini lunches at the "Ground Floor" in the CBS building, but we never cracked open a bottle in the office.

Plus, you never served drinks in the middle of a presentation as they did with the Rachel Menken character. And in the over 40 years I've been in the business, I've never heard anyone refer to themselves as "Mad Men".

Final nit pick... The scene were Don Draper throws DR Guttman's research in the trash is dead wrong. In the late 50s and early 60s, all the major agencies went apeshit for motivational research and fell in love with practitioners of the dark arts, such as Dr Ernst Dichter and others.

Don Draper would have been all over her research like a hound in heat. Remember the opening scene in 'Putney Swope' with the Mensa guy? If you don't, go buy it right now, it's the best film ever made about the agency business.

But my biggest problem is not that 'Mad Men' is written to show that in the ad biz of the 60s, all the male characters are testosterone-fuelled egomaniacs, the women are raging nymphomaniacs, and deep down inside they're all terribly insecure.

What really gets up my nose is that in common with 90% of the movies ever made about advertising, they just don't quite get their heads around what it's like to work in an agency, whether it's in 1960 or 2008.

Yeah, they had a couple of retired hacks as consultants, but not one of the writers on the show have ever worked in any form of advertising, let alone an agency (plus they weren't even born when this series is supposed to take place.)

Don Draper reminds me of those Doris Day advertising movies, where she's the account executive, writer, art director, and even shoots the photography.

It was never like that, even in the 60s -- there were writer and art director teams, contrary to the impression viewers would get after watching the shenanigans at Sterling Cooper.

My first art director partner in 1964 was the legendary Gene Federico. It wasn't down to one Leonardo da Vinci guy in a corner office who pulled miracles out of his arse. And, even if he was Leonardo, anyone showing up for a creative presentation for the agency's largest client without a single idea would have been out on his bum within minutes.

Coincidentally, when Don finally comes up with the "Toasted" line for the Lucky Strike client, someone should have whispered in his ear they'd been using that particular claim since 1917.

Having said all that, I'll keep watching to see if the sex gets better. But I'll Tivo it to kill the 16 ads I don't want to sit through in a 60-minute show! After all, who wants to see a bunch of lousy ads when you're trying to watch a program about advertising?

George Parker blogs in the UK at Madscam and in the US at Adscam. His latest book is '"MadScam" Kick-ass advertising without the Madison Avenue price tag!'. His new book, 'The Ubiquitous Persuaders'. will be published in the autumn.

Comments

Steak

Steak - 06/08/2008

Man - you must be bored to get annoyed by such little things.

 
 
 
SIMON TIMLETT

SIMON TIMLETT - 06/08/2008

I wonder if there is a forensics website where pedants discuss the inaccuracies in CSI? Or a forum where doctors discuss how the amazing procedures we see on Grey's Anatomy are but a conveniently truncated and dumbed down version of what really goes on in the OR? Maybe 40 years ago bus drivers used to hang around in their forums (the garage canteen) and bemoan the misrepresenataion of their profession in On The Buses? It's TV. It's not real life. Mad Men works on the level that it is a slightly quirky, but engaging drama that just happens to be set in an ad agency in a certain place at a certain time.

 
 
 
Robin Jay

Robin Jay - 06/08/2008

George, Simon makes excellent points - it's TV & it's entertaining as hell! Can you imagine a doctor watching a medical drama only to critique the procedures? Yet CSI, Grey's Anatomy, and ER are staples of the programming line-up. The advantage of doing a show that is set in the '60's is that the writers can write dialoge and scenes that are NOT PC and get away with it. 'Arthur' was a brilliant movie because Dudley Moore as a drunk was hysterically funny. We love to watch 3-Dimensional characters, faults and all. the characters on MAD MEN are as complex as anyone was in the '60's. The character of Don Draper is evolving. He is becoming wise quickly, maturing well past the Roger Stirling character, who still acts (as he put it) like he's on shore leave every day. He is getting away with a false identity and living a lie every day. There is a parallel between his character and advertising - selling a package of goods as one thing, when in reality, it's not that at all (like cigarettes to help you relax)! He is cynical and deep because of the life he was given and the new life he has chosen. It was a man's world in the '60's. This show captures that beautifully. It's smart, if not 100% accurate. My first job in advertising was at D'Arcy MacManus & Masius - when I was just 17. I sold advertising for 20 years before becoming a writer and speaker. I love how MAD MEN shows that the outside world doesn't "get" advertising. Is it essential that it be accurate to every last detail? I love the world of advertising - it is creative, it is a real business and even people who think advertising doesn't work use advertised products daily. As Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Running a business without advertising is like winking at a pretty girl in the dark; only YOU know what you're doing." Perhaps you were just trying to share how detail-oriented you are, George, in that you noticed things like copiers and typewriters. It's really a shame if the drama (or melodrama, as you put it) is lost on you. This show is a great snap shot of life in the '60's - even if it's more of a painting than a photograph.

 
 
 
George Parker

George Parker - 06/08/2008

Guys Perhaps I am being a little pedantic over these points… But, that’s because prior to the launch of the first series, AMC, the channel “Mad Men” runs on in the US, made a very big deal about how authentic and accurate the detailing of everything from hair style to clothing to office equipment was. They even ran a promo video which was an interview with the main stylist. He defied viewers to find anything that wasn’t of the period. My good mate, Barbara Lippert, of Adweek fame was the first to point out some of these incorrect details. But, back to the writing… As I said, it isn’t as bad as the Doris Day, Rock Hudson epics, but it still doesn’t give a true picture of an ad agency, either then, or now. Don Draper would not get away with showing up to a meeting with the agencies biggest client with… Nothing. He would never pull the Jewish client with the soporific lines he laid on her. Sal would never be drinking scotch with an Alka Seltzer in it at nine in the morning (well, certainly not in the office.) And when the new girl is sent to the gynecologist on her first day to get fitted with a diaphragm by a guy in a white lab coat who never stopped smoking through the whole procedure… Which apparently didn’t stop her getting pregnant later in the series… Then I have to start chocking on my breakfast martini. Even though it is well written (I actually say that in my third paragraph) I have to agree with Al Rosenshine, when he described it as bullshit. Advertising in America was totally different from advertising in the UK… I know, ‘cos I worked in both. If you accept Mad Men as a parody, then it works. Cheers/George

 
 
 
Rada Petrovic

Rada Petrovic - 06/08/2008

Remember that thing called artistic licence? The advertising industry is built on it.

 
 
 
George Nimeh

George Nimeh - 07/08/2008

I don't know, George, I've started asking myself WWDDD: What would Don Draper do? It seems to help. Here's the answer according to Scamp: 1) Pour large scotch 2) Smoke cigarette 3) Nap on office sofa 4) Pour large scotch 5) Smoke cigarette 6) Throw research report in bin 7) More scotch and cigarettes 8) Have sex with beautiful bohemian mistress I cannot believe you do cannot endorse this methodology, George. ;-) That said, I think your frustrations with the show are legit in some cases, but not everyone from that time agrees. Jerry Della Femina certainly finds a lot of truth in Matthew Winer's tales from Madison Avenue: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/magazine/22madmen-t.html My personal take on the whole thing is here: http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2008/06/don-draper-carousel.html Accurate or not, I think it is genius. Perfect TV. Hope you're staying under the influence, ~G~

 
 
 
George Parker

George Parker - 09/08/2008

George As I said at the begining... It's a love-hate thing. It is without question the best interpretation of the ad biz in the early sixties. Maybe, as a few commeters have said, I'm just a picky old fart. On the other hand, it may be that I wish I could do it all again. I love the WWDDD... That's fu*ck*ing brilliant (asterisks defeat the BR swear nazi) It certainly worked for me. The problem now is that as I work mostly from home, my wife would kill me after the fourth scotch. And she certainly would be pissed if she caught me shagging the bohemian. I'll save all that for the next "Under the Influence" conference. Cheers/George

 
 
 
Bob Ashwood

Bob Ashwood - 16/08/2009

Call me old fashioned, but I tend to spend my time thinking 'what would my consumer do?' Which is one thing Don Draper does occasionally. George N is right it's great TV. Great advertising comes from hardworking, talented people. It is close to a kind meritocracy. The occasionally passenger survives more than they perhaps should be allowed. That a management problem. But, by and large I've found that most agencies are populated by a disproportionate number of brilliant minds that medicine, science and politics could have well used in a parallel universe. After all, as TV drama is always showing us, doctors, scientist and especially politicians enjoy substance abuse, sex and lies in the office, as much as advertising people. The real world is far stranger, more outrageously excessive and unbelievable than any telly show could ever represent. Probably George P is right. It's best watched as a parody. Although I have seen a number of sad f***s in London over grooming for work these days. Don Draper syndrome? Now that's parody.

 
 
 

Have your say

Only registered users may comment. Log in now or register for a free account.

* This information is required.

*
*

Forgotten password?

 

Jobs

STAFFING AGENCY :: INTEGRATED AGENCY, Dylan*
,
CEO, PPA
Six Figure basic, Central London
ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE :: EXPERIENTIAL, Dylan*
Good Benefits, Central London
Find over 3000 jobs

Directory