BBC angers Strictly fans with phone vote fiasco

by Nikki Sandison, Brand Republic 15-Dec-08, 09:10

LONDON - The BBC's last-minute decision to put all three remaining dancers through to the final of 'Strictly Come Dancing' has sparked 200 complaints from viewers angry that their phone votes did not count.

Should the BBC charge viewers to participate in its programming? **Vote** and have your say here.

The BBC decided to scrap the phone vote after realising that the judges' marks for model Lisa Snowdon and singer Rachel Stevens were so high it meant 'Holby City' actor Tom Chambers would end up in the dance-off irrespective of viewers' votes.

The broadcaster refused to refund voters saying that the votes will be carried through to next week's final.

The decision was not made until after millions of viewers had spent two hours casting their votes at a cost of 15p a phone call.

Some viewers have complained that it was a stitch-up with the judges manipulating the result to make their choice of finalists inevitable, while others have accused the BBC of changing the rules in order to maximise ratings for the final.

There were originally meant to be three couples in the final, but following John Sergeant's controversial decision to leave the show early, the BBC decided to continue voting off one couple each week and have just two in the final.

The popular political journalist's exit from 'Strictly' sparked more than 2,000 complaints from viewers with speculation that he had been forced to quit following pressure from the judges.

The BBC has been involved in a series of phone-in scandal scandals over recent years. It came under fire when it emerged that between 2005 and 2007 it had kept more than £100,000 that viewers had pledged to charity.

In March last year viewers of 'Comic Relief' were encouraged to enter competitions they could not win because lines had closed.

In July 2006 'Sports Relief' viewers were encouraged to enter competitions they had no chance of winning and winners were faked by using production team members.

Later that year 'Blue Peter' allowed a child visiting the studio to pose as a caller in a phone-in competition when technical problems stopped real calls coming through.

'Blue Peter' found itself in trouble again in January last year after the results of a poll to name the show's cat were altered.

Comments

- 15/12/2008

The biggest problem with all the telephone voting shows is that the actual number of votes cast is never published so with such a lack of transparency who knows if the results are genuine anyway? With Strictly Come Dancing does anyone know how the telephone votes are "added" to the judges votes? Is it 1 point for the lowest number of votes up to the maximum for the highest number of votes? Do contestants get points on a percentage of the votes? Do people realise how much money is being made from the voting? Are the voting public being taken for a ride? And a final rant, which moron decided to drop "The Bil" in favour of "I'm a Z rate celebrity get me out of here"? Oh sorry, it's a voting show that makes money that's why!

 
 
 
Susie Morris

Susie Morris - 15/12/2008

I think this year the magical spark and important element of fun, that is famously associated with Strictly Come Dancing has rapidly diminshed. It all started of course with the chaos surrounding John Sergeant, and the appalling bullying technique used by the self important judges, in a shameful attempt to oust him off the show. Never mind that he had a way of putting a smile on your face. The light-hearted and amusing side of the show immediately dwindled, amidst the whirlwind of outrage from viewers, when it was made plain by the shrieking Arlene and the smug Craig, that whether or not the audience loved a contestant - it had no relevance to their pompous beliefs. So in the aftermath of the latest blunder from this seasons show, poor Tom \(who seems to be out of favour with the judges, but very much so with the audience) didn't stand a chance on saturday of making the final - simply due to favouritism for the females, from the judges. Oh dear, the show is in danger of turning into a predictable, boring, dance contest, when its very charm used to be with the unusual, quirky and hilarious mix \(i.e Julian Clary, Chris Parker and Kenny Logan) of celebrities giving us unbridled entertainment!

 
 
 

Have your say

Only registered users may comment. Log in now or register for a free account.

* This information is required.

*
*

Forgotten password?

 

Jobs

Directory