Think BR: Google+ is here to stay so avoid it at your peril
The future looks bright for Google+, particularly if social signals can be shown to have a strong relationship with natural search rankings, writes Kelvin Newman, director of strategy, SiteVisibility.
Kelvin Newman, director of strategy, SiteVisibility
When Google announced the introduction of its new social network Google+ last June, the anticipation was intense throughout the search marketing industry.
Would this signal the end of Facebook? Was there room for another social network; I mean, did we really need another? While Google+ hasn’t brought about the demise of Facebook, it is holding its own and gradually establishing itself as a potentially major force in social media.
However, many marketers are still on the fence about adding the site to their social media efforts.
Discussions continue to this day about the health and success of the network. Some do claim it to be a huge success, while others have compared the platform to failures such as Buzz. However, for SEOs, it doesn’t matter.
True, the site might not be the runaway success its founding group had hoped for. However, growth is steadily increasing, with 250 million accounts created as of July 2012.
Recently released apps for mobile devices, along with feature and functionality improvements, are attracting attention and expected to increase both membership numbers and activity rates.
Though it may be a while before Google+ exceeds or meets Facebook in terms of popularity, the future is looking bright for the viability of Google+. It is a worthwhile service and one of great importance to marketers.
It’s no secret that Google wants to better integrate social signals into its algorithms to better reflect who’s ‘socially significant’.
Google either doesn’t have much access to data from the other big social networks or if it does it's paying a pretty penny for it.
So it’s no big surprise that one of the reasons many companies are investing time and effort into Google+ is the expectation that it is currently having an influence - or will in the future - on natural search results.
The idea being that as more people share content on social networks it becomes a better indicator of the ‘best’ content the search engines want to return.
There have been a number of studies which suggest social signals like ‘tweets of links’ or ‘likes of a page’ are correlated with high rankings.
Two well-known studies from SEOmoz and SearchMetrics are keen to point out that this correlation does not mean there is a causal relationship, ie, pages with good social signals may not rank highly simply because of their social signals.
Perhaps the best way to illustrate this is the fact that Facebook likes have been found to correlate well with rankings despite Google having no authorised way of accessing this data, and therefore it is unlikely to be using it to determine rank.
However the relationship between the two data points is still very significant and if it’s a metric which indicates ‘high quality’ it’s one the search engines will look to integrate into their algorithm.
Whether this is now or the immediate future matters little if you are trying to carry out long-term sustainable campaigns.
The understanding that social signals have a healthy relationship with rankings makes the argument to invest in Google+ much stronger.
We know the relationship's there, and we know Google has the best access to its own social network, so it makes sense they’ll look there first when considering social signals.
Even if the social signals are perhaps not directly influencing results at the moment, there’s already a strong precedent of social signals indirectly influencing your natural search through personalisation based upon your social connections.
Perhaps the most obvious example of this is in the US where Google has rolled out what is known as Search, plus Your World which explicitly pulls in search results based upon who you are connected to in the social networks that Google has access to.
We can see the potential influence of Plus, but what do we do about it? First, avoid the temptation to go out and buy social signals or votes. It’s unlikely to have any impact in the short-term and in the future you’ll regret it.
Large brands who have bought likes in the past and have attempted to actively reduce the number of people who have liked them on Facebook are now making their social engagement look a little weak. If they’d stuck just to ‘real' likes they’d have much better numbers.
In the same way not all links are created equal nor are social signals. A link from the BBC is more valuable than a link from a hobbyist’s blog. It’s sensible to assume some social signals will be more powerful than others.
Instead what I think you should be doing is understanding which pages and pieces of content you’ve produced are being shared on social networks and do more of the same.
Also use a tool like Social Crawlytics to get a sense of what assets being built by your competitors is getting picked up socially. Learn from their successes and work those findings into a content strategy.
Also in the same way you’ll assess the results of a piece of content by looking how many views it has on YouTube or views on Google Analytics you should be reporting on the number and quality of social shares.
This might not be a report you present to the board but this will be data which you can act upon, and allow you to adapt your strategy accordingly.
The challenge is not how can I get my content social signals, but rather how can I get content that gets social signals.
Kelvin Newman, director of strategy, SiteVisibility
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
- SHOPPER MARKETING ACCOUNT HANDLERS - London agencies - £38k-55k (perm & freelance) Judi Patton £28-£55k- plus bonus and benefits, London
- head of new business > #1 DIGITAL & CONTENT AGENCY collectivo £60k-£80k plus agency bens, Central London
- Account Director Ball & Hoolahan £55,000 per annum, London
- Senior Account Manager - [Retail / Digital] - Superb agency! £35k - £39k Fill Recruitment Ltd £35k - £39k + bonus & benefits, Central London
- Marketing Manager - FMCG - London or Home counties Stonor £45,000 - £55,000 dependent on experience , London, Essex, Bucks or Oxon
- Creative Director The Marketing Practice Up to £120k dependant on experience , East Hendred, near to Didcot in Oxfordshire