Search
 
 
Version:
UK |
Asia
 
Skip To Site Navigation

Jobs

Directory

 

My exciting plans for the Sorrell foundation. 

Comments:8   Add your comment
With a tiny fraction of the money divvied up by Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, Sir Martin Sorrell could transform the Third World. And through advertising alone.

I was reading An Intimate History of Humanity the other day. And was struck by a marvellous sentence along the lines that "nothing distorts human thinking more than the search for a scapegoat."

This got me thinking. For it seems to me that there is one unfailing rule that pertains the world over: if you really want to mess up a country - or a region - all you need do is give that country someone else on whom to lay all blame for any misfortune that befalls them.

Or, put another way, the world really divides into three types of people: those who believe the glass is half full, those who believe it's half empty, and those who believe that the only reason there is any liquid in the glass at all is because the Americans have pissed in it.

(You can add a little variety by attributing some of the piss to the Israelis and the British as well).

Inter-war Germany, check. The Balkans, check. The Middle-East, check. pre-1990 Ireland, check. Africa, check. The failure of South Africa to criticize Zimbabwe, check. Contemporary Scotland, check. The failure to slow AIDS in Africa, check. All of them cases where someone else got to shoulder the blame.

It is never difficult to propogate this notion, either. Any regime will eagerly connive with you in the pretence that national misfortunes can be laid at the door of some external power, as it handily explains away their own failings, while maintaining the solidarity of the populus against the perceived threat.

Generally the BBC will do a good deal of your work for you too, as it steadfastly maintains the pretence that white Anglo-Saxon Christians are responsible for all the world's ills: with indulgences for your failings being allocated in proportion to the degree to which you practice anti-Americanism, socialism, non-Judeo-Christian religions or general brownness.  

Now I should make clear here that I am passing no judgment on whether the blame is justified or not. Merely that the act of scapegoating is catastrophic for any country. Countries such as India seem to benefit from a fairly sane approach to their colonial past (not banning cricket or tearing up the railways); Mandela's great achievement was surely to avoid some of the wasted energy of recrimination.

So here's my suggestion for the Sorrell foundation. Large posters in all the benighted areas of the world simply reading "You're crap and it's all your fault."

In bomb craters in Sadr City you'd run posters reading "If you were Lutherans, this would be an IKEA". And in Palestine the simple message "If you'd spent as much time working as you did wandering through the streets shouting, you could buy Israel by now."

In truth I think the copy and media buying needs a bit of work. But the core strategy is already there.

Comments

July 3, 2007 10:46 AM
 
I don't intend to create a parallel between war or any of the major problems that countries can experience but Rory's point applies elsewhere. Scapegoating is also terrible in any business - or, indeed, brand - as the immediate removal, say, of the guy who implemented an unsuccessful ad campaign may gain PR points but it can stop the business learning from the original mistake. I know it's a weasel phrase, and was used to excuse all sorts of dotcom nonsense in 99/2000, but sometimes people who fail have learnt something important.
 
 
July 5, 2007 8:06 PM
 
You are a bloody genius Sutherland
 
 
July 6, 2007 2:10 AM
 
There is a fine line between irony and boorish insensitivity. Rory - its behind you. All things being equal, you can say with justification that the Palestinians can buy out Israel in a thrice - but unfortunately reality intrudes. There is a fundamental barrier to their success and it might perhaps involve a complete lack of ecomonic, let alone natural justice. Lets take it back to Apartheid era South Africa, the Belgians in the Congo, or even pre-Independence America. Following your logic would suggest that the stiff upper lip and a resigned acceptance of the Realpolitik is the route to long term success - I don't think Mandela would buy your arguement in a second.
 
 
July 6, 2007 9:06 AM
 
I am not suggesting this would work everywhere. In North Korea and Burma there seems to be a shortage of ad inventory. And I wouldn't suggest for a second that self reliance alone will work every time - or that it could get you through a few years in a gulag. IN case you think I'm Melanie Phillips, My campaign of rudeness in the Middle East would not take sides. In the new settlements would be posters reading "Get back to Brooklyn, you tossers!" and "If you really belong here, why are you wearing a furry hat when it's 130-degrees?" But without a degree of self reliance, absolutely nothing works. And nothing kills self reliance quite like a convenient scapegoat. It's one of the things that most alarms me about the leftwing urge to spot victimhood everywhere. It's presumably meant kindly, but does it actually prolong the very problem it seeks to cure. Whether self-pity is right or not is not the point. What effect does it have on your prospects? You'd think that socialists would appreciate this point, since the only countries where socialism actually works seem to be Scandinavian countries with a strong Lutheran tradition of self-blame. Milton Friedman once remarked on this. He spoke in Sweden, generally praising free market values and competition. "Ah, but Mr Friedman, what you must understand is that here in Scandinavia we have no poverty." "Funny you say that," he said. "Because in America, among Scandinavians, we have no poverty either."
 
 
July 6, 2007 11:30 AM
 
Rory, you're missing the broader profit opportunity here. There's a case for enabling 'retort' campaigns by private citizens. For every "IT'S YOUR FAULT!" headline, equivalent media could proclaim "NO IT'S NOT!" And beyond this, there's the blame game - "It's HIS fault!" or "It's the GOVERNMENT'S fault". The potential market is huge.
 
 
July 6, 2007 1:59 PM
 
The monetisation of blame! Genius!
 
 
July 10, 2007 2:37 PM
 
Indeed as stated in your social network rant, perhaps sending a text message saying 'Call me' could also be roughly translated as 'blame me' in poorer regions where media buying inventory on mobile portals is not yet fully available.
 
 
July 18, 2007 4:17 PM
 
Rant? These are subtly honed deliberations, I'll have you know.
 
To comment on this post you have to be logged in