Brand Republic
 
Edition:
UK |
Asia
 
Digital jobs

Jobs

Directory

 

Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the greenest of them all? 

Comments:7   Add your comment

The Sunday Times this weekend published its top 50 best green companies. It makes interesting reading, as much for who isn’t there as who is.

Top is a JC Atkinson & Son, a company you probably have never heard of. That’s because they makes coffins. An unusual choice, given their coffins are still made of wood rather than the more eco type that are made of wicker or cardboard (check out www.ecocoffins.com). But I guess it makes for better PR. 

In third place is the Co-op (financial services), so no surprise there. Fourth was Pureprint, with with one other printer, Sevenprint, also getting in the top 50.

The National Magazine Company came in at 10th, making  Good Housekeeping more than just a title but an ethos. Though ironically, they don’t publish one ethical title I can think of.

It’s notable that only two top brands made the top ten, the Co-op and HBOS. Overall there are very few big names, the exception being Cannon, Eurostar, Pfizer and Total (yep, an oil company actually made it in). There were also a lack of green and ethical brands, though Good Energy, Greencare H20 and Renewable Energy Systems got places.

So where were all those brands that have been spending a small fortune on telling us green they are or how much they are saving the environment? Well at least E-on sponsored it.

Not surprisingly, no agencies or agency groups made it anywhere into the list, though ?What if? did make 18. Reading the blurb, many agencies may want to follow their lead, especially in taking big gas guzzling cars away from directors and subsidising the purchase of G-Wizz electric cars and bikes.

Clear Channel Outdoor made 22 (thankfully no one asked if using electric light to illuminate posters at night was green or not).

One other media company, Pindar Set, got in and are involved with Yellow pages. Now, maybe I’m wrong here, but in an era when the majority of homes have internet and almost everyone has a mobile, is dumping 22 million copies of directories on people’s doorstep very green? I guess that isn’t a question that would be on the ST’s application form. 

It may be that this is more an exercise in form filling and box ticking than actually being a really ethical company. I for one was not convinced that it was a list of the best green companies when so many really green ones were not there (especially ones that feature high in the Ethical Brand Index) like Body Shop, Boots, Ecotricity, People Tree, Terraplana and the many, many more. And where was the Carbon Neutral Company?

Sunday Times do make a point that it’s for those ‘striving to improve their environmental performance.’ That’s not the same as being green, so the ‘Best Green Companies’ is a bit of a deceptive title. It should be called, “The companies trying to get greener’ list. It’s also notable that they can’t decide if it’s a competition or list.

But one bonus of buying the Sunday Times is that you can get a free eco-bag with a Best Green Companies logo on. Except it’s not actually free as you have to pay £1.99 for postage and 8p a minute to order it. If, like me, you already have a massive collection of free eco-bags (full of free energy saving light bulbs) I can’t see any need for another. Though I’m sure they’ll find a way to recycle them next year.

 

 

 

Comments

May 19, 2008 9:59 AM
 
Chris, there are stories behind each one of the organisations that wins a place in this listing and you need to get your facts right about Yellow Pages. We work with the Yellow Pages Directory Recycling Scheme. Yellow Pages are fully recyclable into cardboard, animal bedding, packaging, insulation and newsprint. 99% of local authorities now collect them for recycling and 66% of households recycled them last year. And more than a quarter million school kids have been recycling them each year via The Yellow Woods Challenge, a schools environmental competition run in conjunction with The Woodland Trust and local authorities.
 
 
by FP
May 19, 2008 11:53 AM
 
I think the point was that you don't need these things in the first place, not that they are recyclable. Regardless of the second use of the paper, there is a huge amount of energy needed to create the original item and dump in on everyone's front doormat. Ours travels from front door to recycling without us using extra calorific energy to open it which we consider part of 'doing our bit'.
 
 
May 19, 2008 12:49 PM
 
Amen, and well said (inc..... especially the bit about the bags. Just got my latest, much fairer P&P, sets from the Dailys Mail and Telegraph - from when they were having a quick green movement/week/day. I was going to say you can never have enough... but my collection is now getting to surplus (which begs other overall 'eco' questions). I was going to blog on this, but you really have covered most, so I'll piggy back. I was at first keen on entering this contest, but having read what it was all about, plus the fee, soon lost interest: http://junkk.blogspot.com/2007/12/awards-sunday-times-best-green.html These 'eco/green' specials, especially those with an award or ranking, are really getting quite out of control. It's almost as if the media dept. is calling up editorial and saying 'hey, here's a way to make money. And oh, by the way, we can call it 'green', for extra kudos on us too!' I have not read the articles in this latest issue (frankly one look and it became a duty rather than a joy to even spare it for subsequent professional review as opposed to personal interest), but I truly hope the editorial standards have not been shaped by who the sponsors are, as much as they have been in the past: http://junkk.blogspot.com/2007/12/he-who-pays-piper.html On a purely subjective, creative note, I was also struck by how unutterably dull it all was. What was there to excite... motivate? I know it was a business insert, but the general public do read the ST too. This extra wadge of newsprint must have ended up straight to bi... er..recycling. Oh, the irony. The shame of it is that it was... is a nice idea (once the rather disingenuous distinctions of the measures of merit used are resolved), and could have been great. Also that there are, doubtless, a few genuine folk in there who scraped together the necessary to compete and deserve a big up. But sadly, they are not finding themselves always in the 'best' company or, forgive me... 'environment'. I have to say that I am starting to look at many 'green' awards, and many 'conferences/summits', as more methods to create income (often from those who can ill-afford the budgets) and/or drive spurious PR for those able to afford to enter or lobby the organisers and/or 'expert' judges they hire, which serves the worthy guys out there poorly indeed.
 
 
May 19, 2008 5:23 PM
 
To answer Fraser Peett, I don't think Chris's point or yours should be telling people what they do or don't need. The point is that all brands create environmental footprints, so all should be accountable. Recyclability is a part of accountability, whether you like it or not. Whether brands should continue to exist is another debate entirely - but a debate, not a diktat. It's nothing to do with you not using them or liking them (if it was, I'd ban all video games, not just Grand Theft Auto). As such, it behoves any brand to do something about their environmental impact. This still seems to be something that many of you guys sitting on the sidelines just don't seem to get - people getting on and doing something about it. You still think it's 'worthy', don't you. Wake up. Cynicism doesn't help anybody.
 
 
May 19, 2008 5:26 PM
 
Well, OK, then, Fraser Peett. If the argument is not about people doing something positive about the environmental impact their brand makes, but about which brands shouldn't exist because we personally don't think they should...can I ban all video games, not just Grand Theft Auto? Oh, and Manchester United, too. Not to mention Ryan Air...
 
 
May 20, 2008 12:03 AM
 
There's a reason they aren't called the Green Pages. Because they aren't. Chris has a very valid point about dumping copies on doorsteps. Add to that the red business pages and Thomson and that's a lot of paper. I am surprised it's 66% of homes recycle their Yellow pages. In my area most end up in bins and my council won't recycle them (or window envelopes and plastic milk bottles). Maybe I'm in the 1% but after they empty the paper bins they leave the yellow pages. In these modern times of digital communications why do we have the Yellow Pages except to sell ads?
 
 

Pingback from  Save the planet: No More Directories and No More Yellow Pages! | That Danny!

 
To comment on this post you have to be logged in

About this blog

Arnold on ethical marketing

Ethics is the fastest growing area of marketing. From green campaigns to greenwash. It's hot. It's complicated. And most companies get it wrong.
 

About the author

CHRIS ARNOLD

Blogging for:

Arnold on ethical marketing

Member since: 03 Jun 2008

Last login: 04 Dec 2008

Total Posts: 217

 
 
 
 

Tags

 

Syndication