Mark Ritson on branding: Inditex shows H&M's vulnerable side
One of my very good friends from university, Simon, has allowed himself the luxury of a slight paunch just like mine. When we go out for a few beers we look like two relatively successful, 30-something professionals.
Then there is my friend Tony who, to everyone's annoyance, has remained
remarkably fit. In fact, he is probably thinner now than when we were
playing football together in 1989. Go out for a beer with Tony and you
ADVERTISEMENT
happen. On one particularly rough night, I was actually mistaken for his
father.
The lesson here is that everything is relative. This applies just as
well to brands as it does to overweight columnists. Take Swedish fashion
retailer H&M, for example. By most accounts the brand is in great shape.
The problem for H&M is that it is inevitably compared to its major
rival, the Inditex group from Spain, which owns several retail brands,
including Zara, and recently overtook H&M to become Europe's biggest
clothing retailer.
While H&M will add another 100 stores to its network by the end of this
year, Inditex is opening one a day and will end 2006 with almost three
times as many outlets as its Swedish rival. H&M can feel pleased with a
share price that has increased by 25% over the past year - until it
compares it with the 50% increase in the value of Inditex stock over the
same period. The biggest headache for H&M is that its in-store sales
were flat for the first half of 2006. Meanwhile, you-know-who saw its
sales grow by 5% over the same period.
Go beyond the current numbers and the inherent superiority of Inditex
continues. H&M has extremely efficient relationships with its suppliers
that enable it to source fast fashion at relatively low prices. It is a
distribution network that would make most other retailers green with
envy - except for Inditex, which manufactures most of its own clothes in
Spain. This cuts its costs even further, slashes the time it takes to
get products to market, and avoids the tariff issues and import quotas
that are likely to afflict H&M in the next year.
Then there is brand architecture. H&M is a classic 'branded house'.
Everything is monobranded with the H&M logo. Even when Karl Lagerfeld or
Stella McCartney have designed collections for the retailer, they were
billed as working 'for H&M'. No sub-branding here. While a branded house
confers focus and relative savings in brand-building, it can also
restrict growth, diversity and risk-taking over the long term.
In contrast, its Spanish rival runs a classic 'house of brands'. Inditex
is the parent company for a range of eight brands that includes Zara,
Massimo Dutti, Lefties and Oysho. This allows it to target different
segments, experiment with different approaches and also share the
lessons across its growing portfolio of brands. The ability to manage
multiple brands also opens up the possibility of growth through merger
and acquisition in the future.
Perhaps the relative success of Inditex and its brand architecture are
the reasons behind the bold new initiative that H&M recently announced.
Next spring, the company will launch an upper-market brand that will
retail high-fashion products. The as-yet unnamed chain of stores will
open across Europe and, it is rumoured, include a flagship outlet on
London's Regent Street.
It could be a recipe for disaster. A company used to targeting young,
cash-strapped shoppers with accessible, low-priced products all
monobranded with a single identity suddenly switches gear. From mass
fashion to premium lines. From branded house to house of brands. Inditex
was always going to look a better bet in 2007. H&M might just make it
look better still.
30 SECONDS ON ... INDITEX
- Inditex has 3000 outlets in 64 countries on four continents. At the
end of its 2005 financial year, 310 of these stores were franchises. Its
consolidated turnover in 2005 was EUR6741m, with a net profit of
EUR803m.
- The group employs almost 60,000 people. Its brands are Zara, Kiddy's
Class/Skhuaban, Pull and Bear, Massimo Dutti, Stradivarius, Oysho,
Bershka and Zara Home.
- Zara was founded in 1975 and now has 900 stores in 61 countries. It
has a home-furnishings spin-off, Zara Home.
- Children's fashion chain Skhuaban (Kiddy's Class in Spain and
Portugal) has more than 150 stores. Pull and Bear sells youth-oriented
casualwear in 23 countries.
- Bershka, founded in 1998, targets the young female market. In 2002 it
added men's fashions and it now has more than 390 stores in 22
countries.
- Lingerie chain Oysho has more than 170 stores in 10 countries.
More like this
- Inditex loses ER boss to El Corte Ingles
- Amanda Aldridge on retail: Britain loves foreign retailers - except grocers
- RAPID RESPONSE RETAIL: Trendy Euro chains are forcing the pace of fashion in the UK
- Retail choice: Bershka, Oxford Street
- Gap to launch Banana Republic in the UK as it battles H&M
- H&M hands UK media to Universal McCann after review
- Amanda Aldridge on retail: M&S made the biggest noise in a quiet year
- Martin heads Spanish comms at Altadis
- Mango hires BBJ to boost brand in UK stores launch
- Debenhams wins top Prima award
Jobs
- Senior Account Manager or Account Director
- £30k - £45k + bens + bonus
- Head of Learner Gateway and Communications
- £65k + excellent benefits
- Director of Marketing
- £47,250 - £53,500
- Account Manager


Comments