Additional Information


Content

Food and drink brands put on alert after Lucozade ad ban

Academics have urged advertisers to adhere to European Union rules when making health claims about food and drink, after the Advertising Standards Authority banned campaigns for Lucozade and Naked Juice.

Share this article

Recent upheld health claims rulings

  • August 2012: Weetabix TV ad by Bartle Bogle Hegarty
    Deemed misleading because it was not clear that the claim of “slow release energy” referred specifically to Weetabix when eaten with milk.
  • July 2013: NAH Foods magazine ad, created in-house
    NAH’s “Zero Calorie Pasta” contained 7kcal of energy per 100ml, more than the 4kcal it needed to claim to be zero-calorie or “energy free”.
  • October 2013 Flora Pro.Activ TV ad by Adam & Eve/DDB
    Among various breaches, Flora’s declaration that “no other food lowers cholesterol more” was considered a “specific claim” and was banned because it was not listed as an authorised claim, despite Flora providing scientific evidence to the ASA.

The ASA received 63 complaints about 2013’s "last man standing" TV and outdoor ads created by Grey London, which claimed that Lucozade Sport "hydrates and fuels you better than water".

In a ruling published on Wednesday, Lucozade’s previous owner GlaxoSmith­Kline was rapped for deviating too far from the approved wording in the EU Register of nutrition and health claims, which came into force for UK advertising codes in 2012.

The ads adapted the claim of "contributes to the maintenance of… performance" to the single word "fuels". This meant consumers were less likely to understand the claim correctly, the ASA said.

Professor Paul Gately, the Carnegie professor of exercise and obesity at Leeds Metropolitan University and spokesman for the Natural Hydration Council, the bottled-water association that complained about the Lucozade ads, said they were "not supported by the scientific evidence for carbohydrate electrolyte solutions".

He explained: "Some consumers might not consider the term ‘fuels’ in the context of absorbing calories, which is essentially what it means. It’s up to Lucozade to articulate things properly."

The ruling follows a rise in ads breaching the health claims rules since the EU Register launched, from eight in 2012 to 12 in 2013.

A spokeswoman for Lucozade Ribena Suntory, the brand’s new parent, said: "[The new regulations] are quite complicated… We will ensure that future advertising is more aligned to the authorised claim."

In another ruling published yesterday, the ASA criticised the PepsiCo brand Naked Juice for exaggerating health claims about the benefits of antioxidants.

Guy Parker, the chief executive of the ASA, said: "Claims that aren’t [on the register] simply can’t be advertised. The dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable is not always clear-cut; even big players who invest heavily and well in compliance can get it wrong."

This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Additional Information

Latest jobs Jobs web feed

FROM THE BLOGS

The Wall blogs

Back to top ^