Vitaminwater appeal against ad ban fails
Coca-Cola GB has lost its appeal against the ad watchdog's ban on describing Vitaminwater drinks as "nutritious" in its advertising.
Vitaminwater: Coca-Cola GB appeals against ad ban
The Advertising Standards Authority applied the ban in January after receiving three complaints about a poster ad with the line "enhanced hydration for the nation delicious and nutritious".
The ASA ruled the description of Vitaminwater as "nutritious" was misleading because each 500ml bottle contained about 23g of sugar or a quarter of a consumer's GDA for sugar, as well as added vitamins.
Coca-Cola GB subsequently wrote to the Independent Reviewer, Sir Hayden Phillips, who considers appeals against ASA decisions on behalf of advertisers and complainants.
The reviewer is rarely involved. Phillips received 46 requests for reviews in 2009, while the ASA was called upon to investigate 13,956 in the same year.
The process involves the reviewer considering the appeal and potentially making a recommendation to the ASA Council, which will re-evaluate its adjudication but does not have to abide by the recommendation. Appeals and recommendations are not published.
In the case of Vitaminwater, the ASA left its decision to uphold the complaints and the key reason behind it unchanged, although it changed a minor point in its assessment.
The change concerned a line in the ad, which stated: "Some fruit juice drinks and semi-skimmed milk contained more sugar per 100ml than Vitaminwater".
This was followed by a line that was removed, which noted: "But considered most consumers would understand that these products contained naturally occurring sugars as opposed to added sugars."
A Coca-Cola spokesperson said: "We disagreed with the ASA in its interpretation of the word nutritious and its subsequent decision to uphold three consumer complaints regarding a Vitaminwater advert from last summer.
"We are therefore disappointed with the Independent Reviewer's decision to uphold the ruling, but we welcome the ASA's acknowledgement that there was a flaw in its explanation of the rationale. We will abide by the decision taken and we will not be using that advert again in its original form."
In 2009, two posters for the Vitaminwater range that used the headlines "More muscles than brussels" and "Keep perky when you're feeling murky" were banned by the ASA.
The watchdog said that the "brussels" claim was ambiguous and likely to mislead consumers. The "perky" poster was banned because it could potentially mislead consumers concerning its health benefits.
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
- Copywriter fishtank 25k to 40k per year GBP, Marlow, Buckinghamshire
- PR Account Director fishtank 40k to 55k per year GBP, Surrey
- Head of Marketing fishtank 45k to 60k per year GBP, United Kingdom
- Digital Search & Acquisitions Officer Topshop Up to £30,000 per annum + benefits, London
- Marketing Executive Warner Bros £ Competitive + benefits, Holborn, London
Brand Republic’s first ever online TV show, Big Questions Live wil...
The PR industry’s lack of success at the Cannes Lions festival 201...
Confused by hashtags? Tweetchats? Tweet walls? You’re not alone.Wi...
It’s fair to say we are truly in the age of content marketing, the...
As a nation, the UK is media and technology obsessed with over half of t...
All customers have the potential to become your brand advocates, driving...