Additional Information


Content

ASA to force estate agents to clean up act over 'hidden' fees

The Advertising Standards Authority is making a stand against estate agents and property websites with a ruling that will force full disclosure of previously hidden fees.

Property: ASA forces estate agents to clean up

Property: ASA forces estate agents to clean up

Share this article

Estate agencies will no longer be able to omit details about compulsory fees from advertising after a test case against estate agent Your-move.co.uk, which ran an ad on property website Rightmove.co.uk.

The offending ad drew a complaint after not including details of an administration fee in the quoted price, a practice that will no longer be allowed after the ASA ruled the practice violated advertising rules.

Guy Parker, chief executive of the ASA, said: "Hidden fees are not only unfair, they hit those who are struggling hardest. 

"Our ruling today makes clear that letting agents need to get their houses in order and treat potential tenants fairly." 

The ASA claims the ruling will protect those new to the rental market and unused to some of the practices used by estate agents to hide fees.

In the future, if compulsory fees can not be calculated in advance, the agent must make it clear in the ad that these fees have been excluded and provide additional information to help people "establish how fees are calculated".

In a further warning shot, Parker says the ASA has made it a "priority" to make sure estate agents "bring their advertising into line".

Your-move.co.uk initially attempted to defend the ad that sparked the ire of the ASA by claiming the ad was "in line" with market practice and added that no agent listing properties on Rightmove disclosed admin fees within the listings themselves.

It also claimed the administration fee was information that did not need to be known when people were arranging viewings on Rightmove.co.uk and added details of admin charges were covered on its website and from the Your-move.co.uk branch on request.

However, the ASA opted to take action and ban the ad after ruling that arranging a viewing in itself was a transactional decision and likely to be affected by the cost of an administration fee.

As a result, the ASA stated the ad breached the CAP Code because it did not clearly indicate the administration fee was not included in the quoted price.

This article was first published on marketingmagazine.co.uk

blog comments powered by Disqus

Additional Information

Latest jobs Jobs web feed




 


 


BR Insight

Digital Integration: Connecting the Dots (Webcast) External website

Integrated digital marketing offers huge opportunities to engage, servic...

 

Mobile 2013: Top 5 Need-to-Knows to Fully Cash In (Expert Reports) External website

Mobile marketing is coming of age, and the pace of change is now exponen...

 

Internet Shopping: 6 Quick Wins to Revive Your Online Sales (Expert Reports) External website

With UK consumers spending an average of £1,083 a year online, int...

 

Conversational Mobile Marketing: Engage Customers and Empower Advocates (Expert Reports) External website

The pressure is on for marketers and mobile operators to embrace a strat...

 

Tablets: Redefining Consumer Experiences (Webcast) External website

As a nation, the UK is media and technology obsessed with over half of t...

 

Harness the Power of Your Customer's Digital Voice (Webcast) External website

All customers have the potential to become your brand advocates, driving...

 

Back to top ^