Additional Information


Content

Will 2013 be better for Government?

This is my final column for PRWeek and, as a bumpy year for the Government draws to a close, I wanted to consider how it can change its luck in 2013.

George Eustice: 'A myth has been circulating around Government that its bad press over the past nine months has been caused by the Leveson Inquiry.'

George Eustice: 'A myth has been circulating around Government that its bad press over the past nine months has been caused by the Leveson Inquiry.'

Share this article

A myth has been circulating around Government that its bad press over the past nine months has been caused by the Leveson Inquiry, and that if it could just find a way of parking that, all would be solved. That is not how it works. The press has been grumpy about being scrutinised, but the impact is exaggerated and the press never repays favours. John Major's government let it off the hook in 1993 after the Calcutt Inquiry and was subsequently savaged. Gordon Brown let it off recommended changes to data protection laws after Operation Motorman, but it didn't improve his press coverage.

In every campaign I have been involved with, there are two areas where things are always waiting to go wrong: structure and message. Political organisations are vulnerable to chaos because there are so many people with a view and events move so quickly. Those who work in politics are condemned to hear certain phrases over and over again: 'Who agreed to this?', 'did we know this was happening?' and, most of all, 'why wasn't I consulted?'

The ability to reach considered decisions and then execute them in a timely way creates advantage. Each decision needs to be properly war-gamed so that possible consequences are predicted in advance and factored in. To get things right you need a clear but shallow command structure so that decisions can be made without the decision makers becoming remote and oblivious to the traps that lie before them.

When it comes to message there are three essential ingredients: clarity, consistency and repetition. Without this, all the public hears is noise. At his last party conference, David Cameron delivered a compelling narrative around aspiration that had clarity. But the Government has struggled to get that message hardwired into everything it does so that there is consistency and repetition. Perhaps it will get there in 2013?

George Eustice is Conservative MP for Camborne and Redruth and a former press secretary to David Cameron.

This article was first published on prweek.com

More about


Additional Information

Latest jobs Jobs web feed




 


 


BR Insight

Digital Integration: Connecting the Dots (Webcast) External website

Integrated digital marketing offers huge opportunities to engage, servic...

 

Internet Shopping: 6 Quick Wins to Revive Your Online Sales (Expert Reports) External website

With UK consumers spending an average of £1,083 a year online, int...

 

Conversational Mobile Marketing: Engage Customers and Empower Advocates (Expert Reports) External website

The pressure is on for marketers and mobile operators to embrace a strat...

 

Tablets: Redefining Consumer Experiences (Webcast) External website

As a nation, the UK is media and technology obsessed with over half of t...

 

Harness the Power of Your Customer's Digital Voice (Webcast) External website

All customers have the potential to become your brand advocates, driving...

 

Improving Marketing and Media Performance (Expert Reports) External website

A recent Brand Republic survey revealed that 78% of respondents felt und...

 

Back to top ^