Horsemeat scandal damaging to trust, say majority of PR chiefs
The horsemeat scandal will have a 'significantly negative' impact on trust in meat products, according to 50% of PR leaders.
Headlines from the start of the scandal
A further 41% believe it will have a ‘marginally negative’ impact, the poll of 136 agency chiefs by the PRCA reveals.
Respondents were similarly united on their judgement of Iceland CEO Malcolm Walker’s decision to blame councils for the crisis, with 89% answering it was a ‘bad’ call.
However, opinion was more divided over whether supermarkets as a whole or the Government and the Food Standards Agency have been handling the crisis the best.
Half of respondents said supermarkets have and 44% said the Government/FSA have, with just 6% backing meat producers and suppliers.
There was a split judgement about the Government’s response, which has been led by environment secretary Owen Paterson.
Almost half (49%) pronounced themselves ‘very’ or ‘quite’ satisfied, while 41% were ‘very’ or ‘quite’ dissatisfied, and 11% were undecided.
Two agency chiefs were particularly critical of Findus’ response to the crisis, chiming with previous views on the company.
Storm Communications CEO Derek Lowe said: "Findus should have given a full and honest disclosure of the problem, expressed corporate shock that they had been let down so badly by their suppliers and their own quality control procedures, and a given a vigorous explanation of measures to ensure it will never happen again. Another shocking example of the head-in-the sand mentality of in-house crisis comms teams, with no game planning of how it could play out in the media."
Rob Metcalfe, MD of Richmond Towers Communications, added: "They should hang their heads in shame at the damage they have allowed to their brand. They were too slow to accept the blame, be publicly contrite, and resolve to do everything it takes to restore the good name of Findus. That delay suggests they just don't care about their brand or their consumers."
The full results of the survey are:
1. Whose reputation has come out of the horsemeat crisis the worst?
The Government / FSA 8%
Producers / suppliers 56%
2. Who has handled the on-going crisis the best?
The Government / FSA 44%
Producers / suppliers 6%
3. What impact will this have on trust in meat products in the future?
Significantly positive 1%
Marginally positive 3%
No impact 4%
Marginally negative 41%
Significantly negative 50%
4. How satisfied have you been with the Government’s response?
Very satisfied 8%
Quite satisfied 41%
Don’t know 11%
Quite dissatisfied 30%
Very dissatisfied 11%
5. Was it a good decision for Iceland’s CEO Malcolm Walker to blame councils for the horsemeat crisis?
Don’t know 4%
6. Do you expect this crisis to continue to escalate?
Don’t know 6%
This article was first published on prweek.com
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
- Senior Account Manager fishtank 32k to 42k per year GBP, Maidenhead, Berkshire
- Graphic/Web Designer fishtank 17k to 27k per year GBP, United Kingdom
- ACCOUNT DIRECTOR/SENIOR ACCOUNT DIRECTOR - BTL/SP/Brand Experience - London - £45 - £55k plus bonus Judi Patton £45K-55K plus bonus, London/Greater London
- Senior Planning Director, International Agency, London, to £120k Fill Recruitment Ltd to £120,000, Central London
- Digital Brand Manager Nike Europe Competitive + attractive relocation package for foreign hires, Amsterdam
- Head of Media, Marketing & Communications PGA Competitive, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands
Integrated digital marketing offers huge opportunities to engage, servic...
With UK consumers spending an average of £1,083 a year online, int...
Conversational Mobile Marketing: Engage Customers and Empower Advocates (Expert Reports) External website
The pressure is on for marketers and mobile operators to embrace a strat...
As a nation, the UK is media and technology obsessed with over half of t...
All customers have the potential to become your brand advocates, driving...
A recent Brand Republic survey revealed that 78% of respondents felt und...